Ismail Khoffi
Ismail Khoffi
In case you can consider using an existing implementation instead: Seems like @moxie and @trevp worked on a clean Java implementation (I'm not sure yet how much or if it...
My suggestion is to deploy this on testnet already. Even after we launched it: someone (@SweeXordious, @evan-forbes or @adlerjohn) should submit a gov proposal and we should upgrade whenever we...
My understanding is that for PayForData we want to measure account for the bytes but ideally we also want to add a constant cost per PfD s.t. batching is encouraged...
There is also something else to consider here: the spec currently assumes SHARE_RESERVED_BYTES to be one byte. That almost works because it is an index pointing to some starting point...
> We could just not use canonical protobuf and instead just use the uint8 byte directly. I think this will be our best choice. It would work for the index...
Can this be closed?
I think we should not forbid including the same data multiple times. Also, on the long run, one PFD should be able to pay for multiple messages anyways. Hence, including...
It is a bit unclear to me how this would look like. I think ideally simulate a network with the versions we expect to be compatible (one half runs the...
Yeah, @fedekunze mentioned that to me but I didn't see the discord message nor the code so far. I'll check it out! Thanks for the pointer @hxrts 🙏🏼
Moved to incentivized testnet milestione for now.