kas1e

@salass00 Sorry for the late reply (have issues with AdBlock disallowing me to answer/edit posts on Github, sorted now). As I wrote in beta-list: yeah, everything compiles ok with newlib...

@All I collect some more interesting information which can help us to deal with. I got an answer from Thomas and ask for some help from Frank Wille (VBCC author)...

from newlib's side everything about "not a member of std::" was fixed in the new beta of newlib 53.69 and adtools recompiled with new newlib's headers.

@sba1 @sodero @agfxgroup There is some mess started: We have now 4 different versions of clib2. One in Olaf's repo, another one in adtools, another one is a fork from...

> Use the original one in gcc but keep in mind that something doesn't work if you don't change it deeply And as seems, clib2 wasn't targeting at all to...

@everyone And can anyone explain why we need to keep those "thread-safe" and "usual" versions of libs? Why it all just not "thread-safe" by default of a single version and...

@sba1 Discussions are good, but better to review and accept/reject pool requests, IMHO :) Those discussions always take time and energy instead of the actual stuff. Btw, is there any...

@obarthel @sba1 Giving the VERY unacceptable and slow pool request reviews and accepting or rejecting them, you of course kill all sodero's motivation to continue with it :( Waiting weeks...

@obarthel Yeah, that understandable of course... Maybe indeed better to make some kind of fork then, and working on, and later when you will have more time maybe review/integrate it,...

Is anyone was able to deal with ? I currently hit the same issue.