Kevin Anderson

To clarify: I don't mean at all for these issues to sound like complaints! It's very cool that pvfactors is flexible enough to push these boundaries. And I think it's...

Maybe there's no need to discuss too much until we hear the results of that internal SunPower discussion, but: > I personally think that incorporating pvfactors into pvlib-python sounds like...

Hi @campanelli-sunpower, any movement on the SunPower side here?

@markcampanelli have you had a chance to get back in touch with the SunPower folks? I still view the ideal outcome here as transferring the repo to the pvlib org,...

Ok, check it out: https://bifacial-radiance--432.org.readthedocs.build/en/432/index.html Here are some TODOs that I think yall are better equipped to deal with than I am: - See here for how to set thumbnails...

Ah ha, changing `surface_azimuth` to 270 solves the problem for me as well! Good find @anomam. In fact it seems that any `surface_azimuth` from 180 to 360 works, while azimuths...

Indeed there is a dependence on `axis_azimuth`. Here is a plot of the `axis_azimuth x surface_azimuth` plane (discretized in 10-degree steps, hence the "chunkiness"), with yellow indicating incorrect results. So...

> I think this should be an input with a recommended default I've been frustrated by `irradiance.disc` not exposing the solar constant value as an input, so +1 from me....

@williamhobbs, since you opened #1371, would you be interested in taking a look at this PR from a user's perspective?

> regardless of the model type, all returns will have separate components for horizon, circumsolar, and isotropic (and models without certain components will return 0 where not applicable). Yes, this...