Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
Moving to the 3.0 milestone consistent with other RDF related issues
> We may need to bring someone into this discussion who has been involved in the security working group all along. @puerco @jeff-schutt - Any thoughts? I'm also scheduling a...
@aamedina - Do you think a solution for this issue would create a breaking change for SPDX? If not, I'll move this to the 3.1 release.
Moving to 3.1 to be considered as part of any canonicalization / simple JSON approach
I noticed the CI is failing - I think this is due to some references to the old name `vexVersion` which have not been updated to the proposed new name...
> Would you like me to withdraw this change? Let's just switch it to "Draft" mode. We can switch it back after the VEX discussions.
@VenkatTechnologist - is this PR still valid based on your analysis?
To be considered as part of any simple JSON proposal. Moving to 3.1
I would propose simplifying the algorithm by not handling individual property differences - on deserialization, an element contained within a collection would either have no `creationInfo` in which case it...
We agreed in the last tech call and the serialization meeting that using references to the same `creationInfo` was sufficient for JSON-LD. Leaving this open as a potential solution for...