Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
Since this is a non-breaking change and we don't have a PR in time for 3.0, I'm moving this to the 3.1 milestone
If PR #498 is merged, we could create a additional subclass of `PackageVerification` similar to: ``` SPDX-License-Identifier: Community-Spec-1.0 # PackageOtherVerification ## Summary Verification method to be used for a Package...
Since this is a non-breaking change, I'm moving this to 3.1
@lumjjb - Was anything similar to this requirement discussed in the build profile?
Moving this to 3.1 since we did not get any proposals before RC2
One approach would be to filter out all namespaces that are in the standard SPDX context file. This would leave you with additional namespaces added beyond the SPDX spec. Another...
Moving to 3.1 - if there is a need to document this, we can add it in that release
> The logical model is independent of all serializations, not specific to RDF or to JSON. I think one of our disconnects is thinking of RDF as a serialization. RDF...
After leaving that last comment, I though I should follow up with my opinion that RDF is a data model we should support but I don't believe it is perfect...
Since this isn't supported by the spec parser, I'm moving this to a 3.1 release for consideration