Gary O'Neall

Thanks @aamedina for the references. I was not aware of this effort. Within the SPDX community, we have strong support for JSON schemas and RDF - so this seems very...

I believe this can be added without any breaking changes - moving to 3.1 milestone cc: @JPEWdev @zvr

Since the examples don't end up in the published spec itself, we can probably do this after 3.0 I'm more concerned about the examples embedded in the markdown files

We decided for 3.0 we will just document these in text - moving this to 3.1 milesonte

> I wasn't aware of this open issue. Thanks [@bact](https://github.com/bact) ! I actually wrote some notes for myself to inquire about. Here they are: > > From [Build Profile](https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0.1/model/Build/Build/): "All...

> Of course an SBOM shouldn't claim to conform to multiple profiles with conflicting requirements. But this topic requires a broader discussion which is beyond the scope of this issue...

@manifestori Thanks for opening this issue. > The annotation model lacks "name" and "description" fields, but has "Annotator" with "Person: Jane Doe" or similar format. Is it safe to say...

> Think about a tool converting between formats, if CDX has "Properties" (similar to element-level annotation) that have key=value, should one use statement to have key=value as value? or should...

@manifestori - We'd certainly welcome your contributions :) The only thing required is to submit a PR to the spec. The [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/blob/main/Contributing.md) file gives a few more details. We also...

@manifestori - back from hiking. I like the idea of the properties. The example you shared above looks good to me. One question: What type do we want to use...