Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
Replaced with PR #1030 - could not resolve merge conflicts with this PR
Resolved with #989 - reference https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0.1-draft/annexes/rdf-model/
Agree with @rnjudge comments above - making amendments to the original SBOM would be the preferred approach. That would allow clear separation of the creation information. There are a couple...
I think this would be helpful to add. @kestewart - any concerns since it would point to a non-LF website for the container?
Closed per above comments.
Closing per above suggestion
@kestewart - If this looks good, please merge
Closing as fixed by #968 @vargenau - if you disagree or see any additional issues, please open a new issue
Since we are moving towards using the `licenseXml` to describe the variable text, I am in favor of removing the references. In looking at the description for the [licenseXml description](https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v3.0.1-draft/model/ExpandedLicensing/Properties/licenseXml/),...
> Since we are moving towards using the `licenseXml` to describe the variable text, I am in favor of removing the references. In looking at the description for the [licenseXml...