G.A. vd. Hoorn

Results 1781 comments of G.A. vd. Hoorn

I've been in contact with @rtonnaer and according to him, the nr of occurences of the reported error(s) has dropped significantly. Unfortunately 'nothing' has changed. I put 'nothing' between quotes...

@hartmanndennis: I'm not sure whether it is a different issue. What makes you conclude that?

I do agree that @rtonnaer's description of "mechanical vibration" sounds more similar to what is described by the op in #116.

You're correct that as @rtonnaer describes it, this doesn't sound like the same issue. We (I work with him) probably mixed some things up, which led him to post this...

I'm happy you were able to work around this, but I'm surprised by the solution you present. MoveIt (or: OMPL) does not take dynamics into account. Or at least, it...

> I believe that if the time between the points was too low, or the distance too high it would require massive torque to reach it and at that point...

This should be reviewed together with #239 and #316. I won't do that before ROSCon however, and in any case would like some additional eyes on this.

Tagging this PR with `wrid18` as this is a PR that would be nice to review. #239 and #316 should be taken into account / considered as well.

There has been quite some work on all packages in this repository in the context of #448. I've recently updated the Gazebo packages myself and I've not encountered any issues....

Please see #443 as well.