David Singer

Perhaps Member Submission covers this, and we could simply clarify that this is the case?

Hi Mike, you open by expressing concern that the team/w3m has too much power, but then the first two bullets are places where we explicitly designed processes that do not...

Council: we continue to feel it is the worst solution except for all the others TAG appointment: we simplified Assessing implementation experience: what charters can say and how to assess...

Minor, but I would prefer "takes precedence" to "overrides", and we should have a statement that these policies are written with the intent that there be no conflict, but in...

> I'm also interested in understanding why it is important for the PP to have precedence over the Process. If the documents work together, there wouldn't be any conflict. That's...

I think having the Charters Under Consideration/Development "obviously visible" to the community, and especially the AC and the horizontal review groups and AB makes a lot of sense. I am...

I don't see a need to tie either ProtoCharter visibility or better sign-off visibility (e.g. HR groups, TAG, AB) to Director-Free.

I'm less concerned about liaison _documents_ than I am about preserving the ability to have liaison _representatives_ attend meetings (each way).

@frivoal isn't this text deleted? it's the place where memberships and specifically mutual memberships are mentioned: > from very informal > (e.g., an individual from another organization participates in a...

No argument from me that the old text is confusing, with apparent expectations in examples that are not reflected in the normative text, and so on. Is this a 'high...