David Singer
David Singer
We would also like to start generating a reference-output-set of files, for other implementations to cross-check.
I'd likely be supportive of a higher % of a more realistic number (e.g. the number of AC Reps who have voted at least once in the last year, including...
I think we have always hoped that (2+3) is a 'small' number and could be negligible. But that's large enough to reduce by one the number of votes needed for...
> I assume that even if an AC rep has not participated at all for years, they are always authorized to join the next survey if they choose. I think...
> I am not sure about further requirements. Forcing people to answer a question on which they have no opinion or are happy to be guided by the majority, just...
I suspect that if we had a more realistic base number, we might be able to raise the percentage above 5% too, but that takes data and thought. We're looking...
@vivienlacourba Thank you, this is helpful. We actually had two questions; the first you answer above. The second is whether we could have automated tooling that would tell us, for...
> If you're going to expand the size of the TAG, it should be explicitly re-fashioned as a review board (e.g., "Specification Review and Coordination Directorate") and NOT be able...
Needs TAG input (including TAG alums) please @plinss @torgo
It is, alas, another example where the mental model that a WG exists to make one spec in one charter period is catching us out again.