David Singer

We could look at re-organizing into a common considerations section, working groups, and interest groups, sure. The outline suggests that that might be a way to go.

A middle position would be to get on charters to what I'd also like to get on specifications: that the TAG, AB, and cross-functional groups can give a red/yellow/green light,...

I don't like Vote; I do like horizontal review of charters, and I think it's way overdue that AB+TAG be formally notified of proposed charters before they go for ballot,...

My traffic-light proposal was to provide a visibility to the community - members, team, Director - of the overall feeling of the horizontal review groups. They should be able to...

wow, if it's happening, as an ex-AC Rep, I was unaware of the results of such horizontal review when reviewing charters. I still dream of my 'traffic lights' on horizontal...

Does "No open horizontal issues found. No closed horizontal issues found." mean that a review was done and nothing found, or that nothing happened? But overall, that needs summarizing or...

It might be more palatable to the TAG and AB if, rather than having to review all Charters, there could be some way for any member of the community to...

@koalie I don't understand this: > Furthermore, since the issue was raised in the context of "Director-Free", my preference would be to set expectations at the council level but not...

Perhaps we should make it clear that the TAG/AB have an _opportunity_ to review, and if they do, where they can post the results, without imposing an _obligation_ since they...

The membership and the AC are finally _responsible_, I think. I want their decision to be _informed_. I agree, we have a problem of engagement, partly because I fear that...