Bartosz Blimke

@ojab is this PR still required since https://github.com/bblimke/webmock/pull/992 has already been released?

> "matching headers behaves like hash_including by default" that is not working for me, when I try to match partially the headers, it does not work :( can you please...

@mochetts thank you for reporting. When `with(headers: {})` is provided, it doesn't match and it should. I suggest removing `with(headers: {})` completely. from your code as a temporary solution.

@odinhb thank you for re-raising the issue. I appreciate you solution implemented as specdiff. I can see you put some effort and though to implement it. By just looking at...

@odinhb, thank you for providing a comprehensive explanation. The inclusion of screenshots has significantly enhanced my understanding of specdiff's purpose. As specdiff progresses towards stability, I believe it would be...

@kepstin thank you for re-raising this issue. I agree that WebMock should store the original, not-normalized copy and offer a base configuration or params that allow matching against the exact,...

@mzedeler thank you for the suggested solution. This problem keeps coming back, not only for Selenium but for other drivers used by Capybara drivers as well. I'd like to solve...

@kwasimensah do you have any suggestions on how to change https://github.com/bblimke/webmock/blob/master/lib/webmock/minitest.rb in order to support minitest hooks?

@odinhb by diff adapters I mean providing a plugin interface, so that instead of you monkeypatching RequestBodyDiff, WebMock would proviode an interface to replace default diff with the one from...

No. Are you able to give more context?