Alice Frosi

Luckily for me, the controversial functions with the named returned values have already been removed by https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/11698

@0xFelix @vasiliy-ul do you mind to have another look to this? The controversial functions with the name returned values have already been refactored and removed

/label good-first-issue

/sig code-quality

@mhenriks a part from a couple of small comment the code looks good to me One question, is it CDI that is setting the owner reference on the PVC for...

/approve /hold Holding to let you fix last comments

@cfilleke @jschintag please take into account that we'll need also CI integration. Please, take a look to the [kubevirtci](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci) and [project-infra](https://github.com/kubevirt/project-infra). The CI needs to be integrated in prow and...

> I am currently working on squashing all the commits into something more presentable, and i will also rebase it as part of that. If i don't run into errors...

@alromeros this is an API change and we might have problems with backward compatibility. Have we discussed this somewhere?

@alromeros then I'd like a lgtm from people that have requested this change. Could you please tag them here?