Andreas Reich

thanks again!

When you say you executed the tests, then did you actually run the tests as described in detail [here](https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/blob/trunk/docs/testing.md)? Doesn't sound like it ;) A pull request adding NetBSD should...

At least in theory none of the tests should be failing as they are automatically gated on the features available on each device. Benchmarks and the pretty new `multi_instance` are...

> @Wumpf I get this one failing, as said, we don't have Vulkan yes, as pointed out we can ignore that. Although I think it would be good to have...

Might also be worth trying against the changes on #5681 We've been meaning to put this in a patch release because there's all sort of problems prior to that PR

> I suspect this has something to do with the recent synchronization changes in https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/5681. any chance you could check against latest trunk? We want to release a patch with...

@guusw @vntec did you check on release mode? For Debug we'd only care about regressions if they make things completely unusable for a wide range of trivial usecases - one...

you might also need to add `opt-level = 3` for `wgpu-core` and `wgpu-hal`, don't think that setting is transitive

nice! thank you for digging into this!! I'm making the bold move of closing this as won't fix then, if it's just extra debug assertions we're hitting here I'm not...

Hmm if it can have such a big impact maybe we shouldn't enable this on all debug builds after all We could have two levels of validation `InstanceFlags::VALIDATION` and `InstanceFlags::VALIDATION_SLOW`...