Matt Corallo
Matt Corallo
Oh, I think this was just cause CI was slow and time advanced enough during the test that we failed. Should be an easy fix if someone digs into it.
Heh, 1564 didn't resolve this, it just referenced it...
Yes, your understanding is correct, as for your questions: > It feels odd to have a method called braodcast... that won't always broadcast. Should we either: Probably the second, its...
I left a small pointer on your PR and let's continue there but in general its probably simplest and most-coverage to add a new functional test based on an existing...
I don't feel super strongly that we shouldn't do #3893 and then revert it and drop the FC-without-broadcast stuff once we have a cleaner way of doing recovery (vs just...
Closed in #3881.
Yea fair, it's just an awkward test given quiescence depends heavily on whatever protocol it ultimately initiates.
This certainly doesn't need to block 0.2.
Go for it.
Also presumably applies to BOLT 11, @Roasbeef noted in the meeting.