Starlight220
Starlight220
Where is package-level access needed here?
This concept looks good! A few small notes: - I suggest adding an epoch for the listener callbacks to the Watchdog/Tracer, in case a listener takes a long time to...
@Daltz333 I'm now reviving this PR. What should happen if the PR requires manual updating of RLIs?
Tested in my fork at https://github.com/Starlight220/allwpilib/pull/2
A question here is how to sync the exclude list with the frc-docs repo
Good point, the pipeline here is very out of date with Inspector releases
This now works, but without the comment part -- which didn't work because of the `pull_request`/`pull_request_base` semantic, and I don't know when I'll have the time to work around that.
Any ideas why these are failing? There shouldn't be a difference between Java and C++?
So apparently everything *should* be controllable by default? According to `ShuffleboardInstanceTest.testNestedActuatorWidgetsAreDisabled`, they should. I'm confused.
Having nothing controllable by default might not be a good idea; it complicates tests.