Starlight220
Starlight220
Could this be made part of SysId?
The concept looks good! One thing I'm not sure about is how Java would work with this, regarding @PeterJohnson 's comment [here](https://github.com/wpilibsuite/allwpilib/pull/4851#issuecomment-1364700758). Wouldn't this create dangling references as well?
I was thinking that Sendable would be usable for both DataLog and NT -- that way we reduce code duplication and the dependency on DataLog.
Perhaps use the structured data support that #5391 will add to encode the epochs as a single topic/property?
> other Sendables within Sendable #5180? It still has some design decisions needed, though.
> In 2023, the C++ Subsystem::SetDefaultCommand function could accept an l-value reference to a command variable. That sounds quite contradictory to the design that default commands are owned by the...
@Oblarg what else do we want to define semantics of?
There isn't much API for closing _anything_, especially Sendables. It's a common problem, especially for testing.
That's been fixed by #5838 and will be included in the next release.
Instead of splitting the configuration to the YAML file, having all the format config in one place (the gradle script) would be nice. From the user side, it would either...