Sam Wilson
Sam Wilson
I think they're both acceptable, and prefer the option that doesn't require changing `eipw` :rofl:
@eth-bot rerun
Opened https://github.com/kdenhartog/EIPs/pull/2 with my suggestions.
I'm sorry you've been having an unpleasant time with the bot and the process in general. I'm happy to try and help get your PR merged as much as I...
> I presume in this case the 4 ones about the license can be overridden. I _think_ there are still external links? Three in the reference implementation, and the one...
@lightclient and I are against this proposal.
Personally, I wouldn't explicitly mention a section at all, but I do see the benefit of a hard-and-fast rule. I think I prefer @Pandapip1's edit over @xinbenlv's because the crux...
I am fine with resurrecting the original EIP number. This PR is taking the old format (issue) and turning it into a markdown file, and adding authors. I'd probably recommend...
I'm worried we'll get a ton of EIPs that have the comments left in with this :rofl: I do appreciate moving the optional bits after the colon in the preamble...
That's fair. Perhaps a lint for HTML style comments in `eipw` would help.