Sam Wilson
Sam Wilson
I'd rather just rename the file and renumber the EIP. Seems a tad melodramatic to delete the EIP :shrug: Effectively it'll be the same thing.
I've opened a PR to renumber: #5270
> @gcolvin I think you mean axic?
> We should turn off EIPW for EIP-1. Done in #5278
> Per [EIPIP 62 decision item 3](https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/blob/eb0a9e29714aff55d52574789e8afa430a0c8836/All%20EIPIP%20Meetings/Meeting%20062.md#decision-items-), ERC is okay. Let's go ahead and merge this. I'm still against referring to proposals of category ERC as `ERC-X`, to be clear....
As promised, here's the `eipw` implementation: https://github.com/ethereum/eipw/pull/48 --- I'm still opposed.
With the recent updates to EIP-1, I think the external links need to be addressed before merging, which means restarting the Last Call process, if I understand correctly. I am...
> I don't think this _informational_ EIP can be meaningful without links. I don't think we need to remove links, just embed them in the assets directory.
Opened https://github.com/djrtwo/EIPs/pull/12 with some extremely edited content.
Sorry for the spam authors! Feel free to approve/reject this PR and I'll have to make a new one for testing ;)