Jonathing
Jonathing
This is just my opinion, but if you are going to propose a change to Forge and have code ready to put into it, I think you might as well...
No need to apologize, I just think it is easier that way.
I'll leave this one up to Lex or Paint. Although I would personally be very wary of adding backwards compatibility *directly* into EB7. EventBus 7 was intentionally re-designed to make...
There are a couple of things about your implementation I don't like. But with regards to what we want to add, I do like this. Originally, I was planning something...
Closing because I added an experimental API that allows for this. The implementation details have yet to be finalized, but it works like this: ```groovy fgtools { configure('mavenizer') { classpath...
This PR needs a game test. Specifically, a test that ensures the block item model uses the parent block's render type. One already exists that uses the render type system....
Hey man, sorry I haven't revisited this in a while, I've been totally swamped. Thinking of a way to articulate what it is I actually want in a way that...
If bumping JLine doesn't cause issues with Forge or the game, that can be arranged.
- Backport of #10664 to 1.19.2.
Still need to test Java 25 on 1.19.4 and older before I'm willing to approve this backport. Ports to newer versions are fair game, though.