Henry-E

sure i guess the criteria are mainly - is this a features lots of people want / need or is it a fix for something broken - are there tests...

The vercel thing is just a boilerplate error, don't worry about it. We're going to be done v26 pretty soon so I can just look into fixing the merge conflicts....

Perfect, well I will fix the merge conflicts and try to merge

`multiple_occurences` is now the default behaviour in clap (i think) unfortunately though this test doesn't confirm that. If anyone runs into trouble with using the `--run` command multiple times, e.g....

Seems sad to let this much work go to waste but i don't really know if it would be possible to merge. The IDL stuff isn't something I'm greatly familiar...

Wooh! Everyone I've talked to really likes this approach over the current IDL approach. So I really hope to be able to see this PR reviewed and merged into anchor

At minimum this needs a new tests or to be applied to one of the existing tests with multiple test suites. Plus a changelog entry.

I wish i could figure out how to preview this on vercel

Bloody hell, this rebase thing is a mess, sorry about this. it's harder to fix this particular mess since somehow git has snuck in extra commits between commit: cb46474c38d1a7137e919d35c6dff57ea4b06fb1 and...

Just trying to authorize the vercel deployment so that I can more easily read through and actually check out what this PR is adding in.