Henry-E

- [x] Reverting autocrat changes didn't quite work, will need to do another sync with develop and try again later.

I don't understand why the CI tests keep failing but local is fine. Might need more verbose errors in the tests.

Devnet details ``` Metadata account exists. Metadata Account Details: Metadata Account Public Key: 2nmJLYTKLM9geSYBLAPiFw3UYw1S1SUa9nDTeb1iHNZr DAO Public Key: 8tanoHEyJEQgaasEkv1DxN6umYNWDotbaEpuzstcEufb Treasury Public Key: GFBqvgmjZcqSGdHVeHw48UACg6JUBSJMdX94Gf9bhfLG Delegate Public Key: FutaAyNb3x9HUn1EQNueZJhfy6KCNtAwztvBctoK6JnX Metadata Items: 1. "description":...

Simplest implementation of this would be if we had say, the timelock program, and people were able to create timelocks with a set of instructions but not create the DAO...

Alright [here's the PR](https://github.com/metaDAOproject/futarchy/pull/101) for the metadata program. It's still in draft format, no tests or anything added yet till I get some feedback on stuff like variable names, design,...

More security related PRs?

Probably simpler to close, there's no way that `owner` should overwrite the Owner field of a known account struct. That breaks the whole safe-account programming model anchor uses. At best...

Reiterating here that avoiding numbers in var names is a better strategy.

This is not something to fix, don't call `init, payer, space` on a system account. That's not what it's for.

Please share the code you have that causes this error , or post in the discord #questions channel