Graham

I don't think this needs to be a breaking change. The set can be omitted, it's just that we'd need to separately declare a backing field if someone assigns to...

Yes the backing field is generated, but there's no syntax to read write directly. But we could explicitly create the field in the conversion with the underscore name (and make...

Thanks for the report. Just the kind of example case needed

Project file tweaks are handled by regexes here: https://github.com/icsharpcode/CodeConverter/blob/ccb288b5637c9d96285c3580d1e76275f4c0c4af/CodeConverter/Shared/ProjectConversion.cs#L122-L131 and here: https://github.com/icsharpcode/CodeConverter/blob/1a1e34979727bb469ca62fe0765cf0b7a9bc7242/CodeConverter/CSharp/VBToCSConversion.cs#L71-L83 The latter is probably the right place to fix this one - ideally with unit tests similar to...

Thanks for the feature request. I really appreciate the idea about providing the new behaviour without changing the current experience. In the context of #37 and #245, I'm starting to...

Thanks for all the information - it's so useful to hear from real users. I think we agree about the best course of action! In order to avoid any conflicts...

Thanks for the report. Could you also let me know the definitions (or at least the types) of u.userlevel, userlevel.City_Staff, userlevel.Fixity_ROOT (I would guess the first is an int field/property...

Perfect, thanks!

Thanks for the report, the `snip` is actually relevant here - it dictates what type "var" ends up as. From the error, I can assume it doesn't result in `List`...

If all the types are known I think this will work fine. If the compiler can't tell that's a list in the VB snippet, e.g. because it didn't know the...