Geoffrey Booth

> I'm having trouble tracking down the future of the loader hooks. So I'm not sure the right place for this feedback. Please redirect me if this is not correct....

> This is a different but related request to my ask that we get hook access into node’s CommonJS static analysis to generate named exports from CJS modules. It was...

The entire Loaders API is experimental, so there’s no reason that it wouldn’t get backported to all lines. That would probably be the ideal outcome, as then developers like you...

I don't want to create APIs without a clear use case. If loader authors can solve this problem themselves with a trivial amount of code, I'd leave it at that...

It was suggested to me that I add my view on the above so here goes. - TLDR is that I think we should land https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/52107 and https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/51981 and never...

> Corepack is not lacking maintenance Maintenance also includes responding to reasonable requests, like the request of those who met in the 2024-01-24 TSC meeting for the Corepack team to...

Besides landing https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/52107, there’s another “shortcut” to resolving the Corepack debate without tackling each of the questions in the top post: we could just decide that Corepack simply doesn’t belong...

I think this can come off the agenda. I think we have a way forward where the package maintenance team is spearheading an effort to rethink what the project wants...

> I was thinking that if we land this, we should (of course) do it in a semver major, but also mark it as experimental to signal that we might...

Do any other runtimes support JSONC or plan to?