Geoffrey Booth
Geoffrey Booth
> I’ll change this PR, which turns the flag into a noop, into just a change of default. I’ve implemented this change, if folks would be so kind to review....
@aduh95 I moved the format refactoring into a separate commit on this PR’s branch. How about we land via `commit-queue-rebase` to put both commits on `main`, rather than splitting into...
> One command in a bash script/Dockerfile/instruction is too hard/burdensome for many users. So these users are sophisticated enough to _use_ a package manager but too novice to _install_ a...
> Having Corepack removes some friction for some of our users. Removing it adds friction, I don’t think we should do that. I don’t think this is really in dispute;...
> I don’t think we should remove this without filling it with something else. All this PR does is change how users get Corepack: instead of running `corepack enable` they’d...
> I do not think we should remove this without an alternative. The alternative is that people install Corepack directly instead of it already being included in the Node distribution....
> it defines a canonical way to define your package manager [nodejs.org/api/corepack.html](https://nodejs.org/api/corepack.html) But it doesn’t, really, since npm doesn’t support the field. #51888. And standardizing `package.json` fields isn’t part of...
@nodejs/tooling
This doesn't sound like an improvement to me. We already have the official Slack workspace, and GitHub of course. Adding another official channel means yet another place to check.