Steven Weerdenburg

Results 453 comments of Steven Weerdenburg

This should get fixed as part of #1883 . The resultant PR will add handling for both

Thanks for raising this @Misieqj I'm not 100% certain, but this could also be related to a framework filtering issue we've fixed for the upcoming NUnit 4.2 release. There is...

I recall there may be prefilter logic in the framework itself too. We should consider looking there as well as part of any investigation

Thanks for the extensive write up and organization of issues here @CharliePoole . Lots to read and catch up on past discussions

Hi @EdLichtman Thanks for your proposal, and sorry it's taken us a bit to get back to you. I'm hoping we can take a step back to confirm the desired...

`CancelAfter` should also likely be an option here if you were to register a callback on the context's cancellation token from which you could do things like abort the transaction....

I suppose a bit of an assumption was baked into my suggesting of `MaxTime`. You're quite right that it would only mark the test as failed; the test itself would...

Is there a reason you need to have the attribute load the timeout interval externally rather then to have the transaction derive it's timeout value from the attribute? The `Timeout`...

To expand a bit more: I'm hesitant about your proposed change. Dynamically loading the timeout here, especially from a non-static method, adds considerable complexity. For example, instance methods for "Source"...