Steven Weerdenburg
Steven Weerdenburg
This should get fixed as part of #1883 . The resultant PR will add handling for both
Thanks for raising this @Misieqj I'm not 100% certain, but this could also be related to a framework filtering issue we've fixed for the upcoming NUnit 4.2 release. There is...
The issue I suspect you could be hitting is https://github.com/nunit/nunit/issues/4651
I recall there may be prefilter logic in the framework itself too. We should consider looking there as well as part of any investigation
Thanks for the extensive write up and organization of issues here @CharliePoole . Lots to read and catch up on past discussions
Hi @EdLichtman Thanks for your proposal, and sorry it's taken us a bit to get back to you. I'm hoping we can take a step back to confirm the desired...
`CancelAfter` should also likely be an option here if you were to register a callback on the context's cancellation token from which you could do things like abort the transaction....
I suppose a bit of an assumption was baked into my suggesting of `MaxTime`. You're quite right that it would only mark the test as failed; the test itself would...
Is there a reason you need to have the attribute load the timeout interval externally rather then to have the transaction derive it's timeout value from the attribute? The `Timeout`...
To expand a bit more: I'm hesitant about your proposed change. Dynamically loading the timeout here, especially from a non-static method, adds considerable complexity. For example, instance methods for "Source"...