Steven Weerdenburg

Thanks for putting this all together @TSAVogt I'd been trying to follow along in the discussion, and will refresh myself on everything and give this a look over in the...

@TSAVogt I just want to reply specifically to your question above. There seems to be a lot of interest and engagement from the team in this feature 🙂 You are...

re: sync vs async, I agree with @manfred-brands that a Task-based API is more flexible, especially with regards to the underlying operations performed in a handler. If reporting is a...

@TSAVogt I haven't used it myself, but it came on my radar as I saw the DataDog folks had to update integrations on their end in response to some changes...

Thanks for raising this @DuarteMPG This sounds more like it may be an accidental bug from refactoring rather than an conscious dropping of support. Just to confirm, are you having...

@MaxKot Thank you for raising the issue and all the effort putting together your PR. I also wish that the language support here were better, but have to agree with...

Thanks for asking @MaxKot Seems we may have some differing opinions between team members. @jnm2 @OsirisTerje what are your thoughts on this being included in the framework?

FWIW I like the explicit groupings that multilevel arrays offer here, independent of any syntax improvements (though they certainly make it nicer). I think it defines some ambiguities out of...

Yep thanks @manfred-brands ! I'm glad you had raised the collection initializers point. Sorry about the confusion here. I'd been late to respond but my comment was more in relation...

Thanks for providing your use case @MaxKot . The desire to combine district value sets based in part by NUnit's auto-enumeration of enum values is something that would be a...