Steven Weerdenburg
Steven Weerdenburg
@manfred-brands I found a bit of a write up about the history of this here: https://github.com/nunit/nunit/issues/3532#issuecomment-626189448 That comment mentions avoiding multiple construction of objects. My (perhaps incorrect) assumption had been...
Has there been any movement on this since @myronmarston made his PR? I think I'm running into this when I'm trying to combine `--only-failures` with targeting a specific context by...
Ok thanks for taking the time to explain and summarize @JonRowe
C# 13 introduces an `allows ref struct` anti-constraint which may be of help here
The next release of the framework, 4.2, should include a change which may help here by avoiding the need to explicitly specify the "\\?\" prefix: https://github.com/nunit/nunit/issues/4353 Note that that change...
I can confirm this is still present on latest version of framework (4.1.0)
I agree with closing this. It's possible something might be doable within Nunit for just the .net framework build but it might be tricky to do so without regressing some...
@mikkelbu Were you still working on this? The change you've made seem to work based on my own local testing using [NuGetPackageExplorer](https://github.com/NuGetPackageExplorer/NuGetPackageExplorer).
Thanks for the bug report and clear repro @doxxx . I'm glad to hear the `TestExecutionContext` approach still works. We'll take a look at this.
I can confirm the behaviour, as well as that it appears to have been this way since the `CancelAfter` attribute was introduced in NUnit 4.0. It appears we initially supported...