Jacob Wujciak-Jens

@lorenzwalthert what about [withr::with_namespace](https://withr.r-lib.org/reference/with_package.html)?

I think we could proceed with CRAN submission now or do you have some other things you want to implement?

* API - Agree on both poInts * Extra documentation is always good but if I think back to my first contact with {touchstone} the template/readme made the overall workflow...

Ok sounds good. I think the time to hard-deprecate stuff is now, before anyone else uses the package :D I will think about/write up a draft for JOSS, I think...

I think it was more a case of other responsibilities taking over. I don't think the package has anything that would make a CRAN release especially difficult (e.g. no compiled...

oh thats' a good idea!

data.table has on open issue, should I go ahead and pitch {touchstone}? Or wait till after #95 is merged?

Hey @mjskay thanks for dropping stealth 😄 As you probably have seen we are getting ready to submit to ropensci and afterwards CRAN, so our API should be pretty much...

@lorenzwalthert I think we are now ready to go "Klinkenputzen", don't you think?

@lorenzwalthert Ok looked into it, that is a side effect of the new optional trigger. Even if the workflow is skipped when an issue comment is created that does not...