Jacob Wujciak-Jens

I think we are both happy with the current API right? So we need to implement a few minor changes (stable lifecycle, codemeta etc.) and then we can start the...

dealing with #88 #89 might also be good to do before submission

I read the full {gittargets} review and agree that it is a bit more involved than I originally thought. Though I do agree that it would help spread the word...

:+1: I ran pkgcheck (the ci error is of course wron), which gives a nice todo: ```r ✔ Package name is available ✖ does not have a 'CITATION' file. ✖...

I just noticed we might need INFRA approval before merginging this: >Automated services MUST NOT push data to a repository or branch that is subject to official release as a...

I was about to open an issue for INFRA to look over the workflow when I noticed that this PR also contains the changes from #40956 (+ some new changes...

Nice, great progress! >it made more sense to first add "generic" release candidate and release workflows Oh yeah that makes sense, though I do think we should also add the...

I have opened a ticket with INFRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25708

> before we merge this We also have to wait for infra to review this. > I want to move the process that generates apache-arrow-X.Y.Z.tar.gz from 02-source.sh to .github/workflows/release_candidate.yml as...

I have updated the issue to let INFRA know that this is now ready for their review.