Danny Mösch

You can always replace the parameter with `_` which is what the rule suggests as an alternative. A list of names feels like a too broad way of excluding cases.

> The problem with replacing the parameter name with `_` is that it will often be unclear what it was for, and if I ever need it again, I will...

> > You say func f(x _: Int) {} is ugly and func f(x _x: Int) {} is better? I don't really see this, but adding an option to consider...

Seems like this has never been intended with this rule. However, this sounds like a reasonable enhancement of the current logic. A dedicated rule for disable/enable commands without a matching...

These are good arguments for a dedicated rule.

An option is fine for me as well.