Hiroaki Yutani

Thanks, then I'll keep trying this. I think we have two possible directions: 1. Make `xmin`, `xmax`, `ymin` and `ymax` to aesthetics and add some option to `Layer` (or somewhere)...

> You really want to be able to access either the data coordinate system or the plot coordinate system, depending on the context. Oh, I haven't come up with this,...

Yes, I think I need to wait for it. Sorry I wasn't clear about the current status here.

Thanks. I'm not sure if this is really doable, but I think data frame column ("nested tibble," or "packed column"? I don't know the proper term for this...) should be...

Thanks for your efforts! Let me leave some quick comments. > transformation checking We can define another generic function like `is_finite()` to handle data frames transparently. So, this doesn't seem...

I cannot reproduce the issue on my Windows. Rather, I see the opposite problem... ``` r library(ggplot2) library(ggtext) extrafont::loadfonts(device = "win") p

> ragg doesn't care about extrafonts so maybe that is the issue. Ah, it can be. Then, maybe this issue is the case when ragg won't work with the font...

Thinking this again, `geom_crossbar()` still needs `fatten` on the other hand because the middle bar is also line, not point. So, this seems a bit complicated than I thought. Anyway...

If there's no downside, I think it's nice if we can include this in v3.4.0. It might be another good example to show why separating `linewidth` from `size` is useful.

I guess this is now possible in theory because the latest version of scales can composite multiple transformers https://github.com/r-lib/scales/pull/335