Jonathan LEI

The new universal deployer contract is a completely different implementation that uses Poseidon hash instead of Pedersen. So no, we should not change this. Whether we should support the new...

This is a known issue: https://github.com/xJonathanLEI/starknet-rs/blob/91425ad9c20cceaf87f5ae179341f7e1f7958507/starknet-crypto/src/fe_utils.rs#L43 I will keep this issue open in case someone wants to contribute to add a constant-time version alongside the existing one.

Hi sorry for the delay. I think it makes sense to allow construction of this type. I just want a bit more context on cases where this is useful. Care...

This is a known issue: https://github.com/xJonathanLEI/starknet-rs/blob/91425ad9c20cceaf87f5ae179341f7e1f7958507/starknet-crypto/src/fe_utils.rs#L43 I will keep this issue open in case someone wants to contribute to add a constant-time version alongside the existing one.

Thanks for reaching out and I'm glad you like the library :) Transaction watching isn't something that's built-in right now, and applications must implement their own watching logic. For example,...

Yeah this would be useful. Will prioritize this.

I'm pretty sure you can indeed use the newly declared class in the same block as I believe I've done exactly that multiple times.

Likely a nonce issue. Maybe your account isn't setting to use `pending`. Or maybe the node you're querying against hasn't accounted for the `pending` state update. In fact, even if...

Oh btw this is probably not worth yanking and re-relasing. Sending this pretty much just as a heads up that downstream libs are being broken :)

@tcoratger Yes the codegen file should not be modified in any case, as any codegen update will overwrite all the changes. @aniketpr01 Please make changes to [xJonathanLEI/starknet-jsonrpc-codegen](https://github.com/xJonathanLEI/starknet-jsonrpc-codegen) such that the...