vlimant
vlimant
@nurfikri89 : where are you with adding a test workflow for this ?
please include a test workflow in the nano matrix
enable nano
our initial comment in #44817 about having `Run3_post2023` instead of `Run3_2024` and `Run3_2025` was to simplify things and limit the number of modifiers. if @cms-sw/orp-l2 and others feel otherwise, we...
@patinkaew : please go ahead and modify back to `Run3_2024` and we will also need a dedicated "scenario" (similar to https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/DataProcessing/python/Impl/ppEra_Run3_2023.py) to be able to run this at Tier0 ;...
thanks. next step is to add the nano in the scouting scenario for that era. @drkovalskyi ; what is the scenario currently being run on the scouting dataset, if any...
and also, as previously requested to add a test workflow for that era in the nano matrix, similar to the one already in place
ok, thanks. any suggestion on a scenario name + method name that we need to implement. Can this be a method of `ppEra_Run3_2024` scenario, or should it be `hltScouting_Run3_2024::promptReco` (to...
looks good !