vlimant
vlimant
started with https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/compare/master...vlimant:cmssw:nano_test_runthematrix to replicate the workflows from https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/-/blob/master/scripts/run_test_simple.sh and https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/-/blob/master/scripts/run_test_long.sh
@smuzaffar : do I have to add the harvesting step in order for the cmsbot test to be able to later compare DQM output ? is there anything special I...
passed #39472 , there are a two scripts that are ran on the workflows outputs: - branch size summary using `$CMSSW_BASE/src/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/test/inspectNanoFile.py step2.root -j branchsize.json` - runtime summary using `get_timing_from_jobreport.py fwk_jobreport.xml...
modifying the branch to branch comparison script to cope with pure-root output and finding all edm flat table automatically https://github.com/cms-sw/cms-bot/pull/1872
IMO it was a mistake to let go of #33307 without enforcing the cleanup. Now the cost of tracking this issue on a cold iron is larger. @michaelwassmer : is...
I don't know much more than what the PR description says https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/issues/33406#issue-855779681 looks like there are some python configuration files configuring modules that do not exist anymore ?
why didn't we move this forward @slava77 ?
@makortel have you seen any recent occurence of this ?
@michaelwassmer ; has the branch [CMSSW_12_0_0_ReworkMETCors](https://github.com/michaelwassmer/cmssw/tree/CMSSW_12_0_0_ReworkMETCors) made it in to a PR that you could reference here ?