Tamas Vami
Tamas Vami
> ldmx be an alias for just. and that's something we can do when sourcing the environment, right? I think this will make it almost transparent to most users. Also...
> Just did thanks, but `recompFire` only does `fire` like this now, no? > I could add a check for yeah I think that sounds good!
This seems to be a dupplicate of https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/issues/1226
But isnt this a feature of `uproot`? like if you did an event loop in the `check.py` it should work for the `ana-events.root`, no?
@cmsbuild please test
+analysis * the diffs in the tests are unrelated
@cms-sw/generators-l2 any comments?
One should also have ``` event.add("beamElectrons", beam_electrons); event.add("TaggerTruthTracks", tagger_truth_tracks); event.add("RecoilTruthTracks", recoil_truth_tracks); event.add("TaggerTruthSeeds", tagger_truth_seeds); event.add("RecoilTruthSeeds", recoil_truth_seeds); ``` configurable in the next iteration of this producer
1) ``` --------------- Testing with Biasing/test/ecal_db.py TypeError: dark_brem() missing 1 required positional argument: 'generator' ``` -- > This misses the input LHE library, we cant fix it directly, but maybe...
so when we try to run this inside ldmx-sw we get ``` Evaluator : unknown variable Aborted (core dumped) ``` I looked for hours now which of these could be...