Tamas Vami
Tamas Vami
``` wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/e375990bf13c7073634bf2eab3bff7e84a9d991b/.github/validation_samples/reduced_ldmx/config.py just setenv LDMX_NUM_EVENTS=1 just setenv LDMX_RUN_NUMBER=1 just fire config.py ```
@cmantill can you confirm that you can reproduce the error?
> So you are OK with not having SPs for now? Yes, unless you see where the problem is already, then let's fix it; otherwise having the SP is less...
OK it technically works, but we lost a lot of ECAL which makes no sense since only the HCAL was modified, I'm worried it might be because of the overlap...
With the new gold https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/actions/runs/12961371139?pr=1515 Red looks like the old blue I dont really understand why these fluctuate back and forth, but the blue in this PR looks reasonable... We...
Looks good https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/actions/runs/12997477816?pr=1515
OK so we established that w/o this change the ecal part looks fine and run, with this change the ecal geometry is messed up... I do not understand how that's...
I think we are getting there... now upto event 900 it works and then: ``` [ fire ] 923 fatal: [BadConf] : Relative cell coordinates (90.18, 69.35) mm derived from...
I propose we close this PR too for now. As I understand we cant have this version of the HCAL at the test beam given the absorber constraint
This is partially handled in https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/pull/1514 The rest would need to be done by somebody else who has access to model with the information