Daniel Egger
Daniel Egger
I do find the warnings very distracting as I was looking into improving the #899 situation and I'm also not attempting to fix the remaining 2 or 3 gnarlier ones....
> Well, it does print out the parameter types so you can find the function that is missing... It takes quite a bit of work to look into the Rust...
For me adding suggestions would be a nice bonus but the real important bit is: As a user I want to know whether a function of that name doesn't exist...
Regarding adding a suggestion: I'd be more worried about the size impact than the performance impact on the error path but I'm not actually suggesting that we do this. For...
> That's the point... there is no way to detect whether there are functions of that name registered, short of scanning the entire registered functions base as well as all...
> @therealprof What do you think? Should we bump rust to 1.82 and fix this or stay on `edition 2021`? As discussed in our weekly meeting just now, we see...
Hm, minicom is not by default available on macOS. Not sure I'd recommend that to anyone these days, really.
@adamgreig Any opinions on this? @RossSmyth Is the lock file necessary? We usually don't do those...
> Then how do you ensure that your end users have a consistent experience? If the software breaks then someone has done a bad job at doing proper semantic versioning...