stscijgbot

Comment by Karl Gordon: Is this something that is straightforward to implement/test?  If so, then I can look at doing this in the PR I'm working on for this step.

Comment by Misty Cracraft: If MIRI imager TSO data is put into the calwebb_tso3 pipeline, but is missing the TSOVISIT=True keyword, it tries to run the spectroscopic steps, rather than...

Comment by Bryan Hilbert: This issue is critical for science operations. Knowledge of potential contamination is fundamental to getting good science results from WFSS data.

Comment by Kevin Volk: The correction of spectral overlap is essential for science in this mode.  It may also be essential for commissioning (e.g. in the standard star observations to...

Comment by Anton Koekemoer: This issue was discussed in [JWST CAL WG Meeting 2020-05-12|https://outerspace.stsci.edu/display/JWSTCC/2020-05-12+Meeting+notes] where [~bushouse]  confirmed that SCSB (tracking this issue at [#3861|https://github.com/STScI-JWST/jwst/issues/3861]) has the necessary details in hand...

Comment by Howard Bushouse: Cal WG specs for contamination removal are located at [https://outerspace.stsci.edu/display/JWSTCC/Enhanced+WFSS+Contamination+Removal]

Comment by Howard Bushouse: Presentation to Cal WG containing an overview of the methods is here: https://outerspace.stsci.edu/download/attachments/52332515/WFSS%20Contam%20Pipeline_revised.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1571151485692&api=v2

Comment by Anton Koekemoer: This issue was initially presented in [JWST Cal WG Meeting 2019-10-15|https://outerspace.stsci.edu/display/JWSTCC/2019-10-15+Meeting+notes]  and also more recently discussed in [JWST CAL WG Meeting 2020-05-12|https://outerspace.stsci.edu/display/JWSTCC/2020-05-12+Meeting+notes] where [~bushouse]  confirmed that...

Comment by Megan Sosey: See https://github.com/spacetelescope/imexam/issues/154

Comment by Megan Sosey: See https://github.com/spacetelescope/imexam/issues/154