smilius42

Update: at our Episciences journal we just had a case of an editor not following up on a submission because he did not keep track how many reviews were still...

Dear @rtournoy, ideally, there should be two things: 1) an automatic email when the last missing report for paper is submitted (it should have a different email than the existing...

Not really, because this requires that you set a non-zero 'minimum ratings count'. Unfortunately, this minimum number of reviews is then enforced by the system globally through the whole process,...

Note that this request is different than https://github.com/CCSDForge/episciences/issues/239 Even if the minimum rating count if zero the editor should still get an automatic reminder if no reviewers are invited after...

Yes, https://gitlab.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ccsd/episciences/-/issues/293 is the same issue as this one.

As far as I am aware there is no difference between handling and communicating editors in Episciences. There are only editors. What I mean is that authors should be able...

Maybe - it looks like it should do this. But I see no documentation of this setting in the user's guide: https://doc.episciences.org/en/users-guide/journal-settings/ So it's hard to know what exactly this...

For the 'Submitted' state: this also concerns submissions which are newly submitted (not only revised versions). In addition, I propose that the time after which the automatic reminder should be...

Please have a look at lmcs submission #15661. The editor invited a reviewer with his current email address which is different from the one associated with his account. When the...