silabs-robin

I am back on this branch. Will close and re-open when ready, in case people are "subscribed" to this PR.

I am trying to understand the scope of what makes this problematic. "additional complexity to the environment" should indeed be for essential complexity and not accidental complexity. The coverage agents...

We have had internal reviews and the vplan is being uploaded in a PR. If no additional OpenHW-orchestrated review meeting is desired, then this issue can be closed.

> Is that https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-verif/pull/1288? Yes.

Hi. Are there any updates on this? As I am un-commenting back in some 40x "rel_check" tests now, I noticed that "debug_test" is still commented out of 40x "ci_check". Did...

_"Arrange for a review call for the verification plan"_ This can wait a bit, as we have more vplans coming up (PMP, CLIC, Zc), and it could be(?) more efficient...

We have had internal reviews and the vplan is being uploaded in a PR. If no additional OpenHW-orchestrated review meeting is desired, then this issue can be closed.

> Is that https://github.com/openhwgroup/core-v-verif/pull/1287? Yes.

> On my fork of core-v-verif there is a branch cv32e40x_dev_incompatible_with_e40s that illustrates the point. This branch updates to the RVVI and RVFI agents to be compatible with the E40S...

This is what I could find: ``` _c classes (same as guidelines) ""/_enum/_t enumerated types (inconsistent; what about typedefed enums?) _pkg packages (same) _if interface types (different from guidelines) _if...