Scott Marlow

FYI, WildFly is passing Faces signature tests with both Platform TCK Faces signature (which seems to have been updated after Faces Specification TCK signature file was added) and with Faces...

https://jakarta.ee/specifications/faces/4.0/apidocs/jakarta/faces/component/uicomponent would be expected to reflect what the Mojarra project uses since https://github.com/jakartaee/faces depends on Mojarra to provide the Faces 4.0 SPEC API. It would be better if the Faces...

> In my opinion, this looks like an oversight and this challenge should be accepted but I want to hear what @arjantijms and @BalusC have to say. There is precedence...

Should the `appealed-challenge` be removed and instead `invalid` be used here? From the `Rejected Challenges and Remedy` section of https://jakarta.ee/committees/specification/tckprocess: > When a challenge issue is rejected, it MUST be...

5. Copying the (not yet updated for 4.0) Faces TCK user guide from https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/tree/master/user_guides/jsf. The [Platform TCK install guide](https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/tree/master/install/jsf) could also be copied or [merged with existing test2/README.md](https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mojarra/blob/master/test2/README.md). 6. Signature...

Wiki page https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/wiki/Guide-to-adding-Specification-Assertions has the intention of adding a guide for adding assertions but we need to decide if we will include test assertions or not in new TCKs, which...

Is there a reason why this challenge hasn't been labeled as `accepted` yet? > Since the ability to decorate is rather important and we have no other test coverage for...

@jeanouii Please do supply the required information mentioned in the TCK process document: > Challenges MUST be filed via the specification project’s issue tracker using the label challenge and include...

@lukasj is this pull request targeted for Persistence 3.1? Also could we get a RC3 pushed to maven central to ensure that all Persistence 3.1 compatible implementations have access to...

> > Also could we get a RC3 pushed to maven central to ensure that all Persistence 3.1 compatible implementations have access to the latest changes without depending on the...