Scott Marlow

> > Can you please bring your use case here and state what stops you from releasing a spec? As an example, assume that we want to release Persistence Spec...

> > > Can you please bring your use case here and state what stops you from releasing a spec? > > > > > > As an example, assume...

> In order for Jakarta Persistence to be included in any Profile or Platform release, type 2 or 3 TCKs must be provided. The Platform TCK will have the Persistence...

@edburns should this issue be assigned to you? For reference (3rd item) from https://jakarta.ee/specifications/platform/11/: > Removals, deprecations or backwards incompatible changes > - Prune ManagedBeans > - Remove all use...

We also need https://github.com/jakartaee/transactions/pull/222 to be merged and included as well when we add the (current) Transactions 2.1 SPEC API to the EE 12 BOM for it to be useful...

We also should try to follow a wave ordering (e.g. ensure that each spec api added to the BOM has all of its own SPEC API dependencies available). Hope that...

> > If yes, that may be hard to test since the test source that contains the @DataSourceDefinition must be recompiled after the test source is updated to include database...

Thanks @bstansberry @hantsy for the feedback! From the discussion here I see interest in using expressions in @DataSourceDefinition(s) in Jakarta EE 11 application source code. If/when that becomes a feature...

Thanks @bstansberry + @darranl! I just opened https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-19511 for this pull request.

> Failed format check on this pull request: > > * The description must contain a link to the JIRA issue > (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-XYZ) I cannot edit the description so someone...