Scott Marlow
Scott Marlow
FYI, we are working on refactoring the Platform TCK so that it will be easier to deal with. The branch is https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/tree/tckrefactor which might be easier to deal with (e.g....
Could one of the Faces SPEC committers please add the `challenge` label to this issue.
> Please clarify this behavior. I assume that the TCK test is simply wrong and hereby challenge it. @lukasj could you please add the `challenge` label and if you agree...
@lukasj do you approve of this challenge for com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/criteriaapi/metamodelquery/Client.java#fetchTest ? Please add the TCK `challenge` label and accept or reject if possible.
@gavinking could you please add the `challenge` label to this issue. Thanks
Thanks @lukasj, I'll go ahead and exclude `com/sun/ts/tests/jpa/core/criteriaapi/metamodelquery/Client.java#fetchTest_from_standalone` for this challenge. I'll release a new 3.1 JPA TCK with this exclude. I'll see what the equivalent exclude is for the...
Addressed via https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/pull/1294 which references the wrong issue number but has the correct changes so will stick with it so we can release the fix.
@bstansberry this one is ready
I just synced with the latest changes. I'll squash the changes on the next sync.
Faces implementations may need to generate (textual) Faces TCK test results which may not be easy...
> Good point, maybe a custom maven plugin would be the best approach here? :+1: Being able to generate a failsafe-report.txt would be nice. Going deeper than that to identify...