Robin Sommer

Nice idea, +1.

(deleted my previous comment as it wasn't right.)

Turns out it's actually the regex engine producing that and aborting. But we can fix that, I'll look into it. ``` printf 'xxx' | ./src/tests/retest '[[:xyz:]]' === Pattern: [[:xyz:]] ===...

Fixed now in https://github.com/rsmmr/justrx/pull/6, still needs a submodule bump.

I'm thinking we could go the Python route and provide an option to choose the method for failure handling: https://docs.python.org/3/library/codecs.html#error-handlers. We could offer equivalents for at least `strict`/`ignore`/`replace`, and do...

It's a problem with printing a method, it's not about reserved words. Renaming ticket.

Like #1238, will need some digging what's going on.

Yeah, that syntax doesn't work, but you should be able to do this differently: ``` public type Someunit = unit(arg1: string, arg2: string) { on %init { self.other.connect(new AnotherUnit(arg1, arg2));...

Yeah, it is intended. The idiom to use `new` is there in the docs for sinks. What seems missing is showing somewhere that `new` can be used with unit parameters.

Just to acknowledge this: yes, this is very much on our radar and we exploring ways to make compilation faster.