Rob Shakir

ACK -- I am not arguing against having this support, just suggesting that code contributions on this would be welcome given that it is not within the current contributors' primary...

Thanks for reporting this. I agree with your assessment -- there is some discrepency in the support for `passive` being specified per-level across different implementations. We'll discuss this within the...

Sorry -- yes, this is ugly. We generate a getter for this leaf if you use `-generate_leaf_getters` which allows you to do `area.GetIdentifier()` but we don't do anything special for...

@dplore did this -- closing :)

I suspect we actually need this configuration to ensure that UDP decapsulation can be covered. I'll re-open this issue to keep it tracked -- especially with overlap with #1153.

@LimeHat Apologies, missed this issue -- with the deprecation of `OK`, then `RIB_PROGRAMMED` should be used IMHO. Any thoughts?

Currently this is not tested in the compliance test suite, because we always assume that we specify some persistence mode, and `SINGLE_PRIMARY`. Tying adding the compliance test in https://github.com/openconfig/gribigo/commit/689fdad9f8f1d165acff51b6cbc6da1c0735352e to...

The best way to do this is to use the OpenConfig linter that is available as a plugin to pyang -- [github.com/openconfig/oc-pyang.](https://github.com/openconfig/oc-pyang) If you run `pyang --plugindir --lint --openconfig` then...

Thanks for the contribution. It seems like there are two separate proposals here (as I see it, YMMV). The first is to allow there to be a way to filter...

This LGTM, thanks for all the iteration @karimra and @hellt. I'll also review the changes that you have made in the reference repo for the README.