Rob Shakir
Rob Shakir
@dependabot rebase
This looks like something that needs to be added to `ygot.Diff` -- since OpenConfig does not use `presence` containers then not all functionality that pertains to them may be supported...
w.r.t backwards compatibility -- this should be done by providing some `DiffOpt` to `ygot.Diff` to say that you care about presence containers IMHO.
As with most open source projects, the feature set of ygot tends to be driven by contributions where there is interest in a feature -- and by having those with...
I think this is darwin, right? I wonder whether we can use the `macos-latest` target to run on M1? [docs](https://github.com/github/roadmap/issues/528). w.r.t the initial question -- these failures will mean that...
Oh, aologies -- these are not actually available it looks like. Sorry for the noise.
In practice, we have found that fixed-precision numbers are generally not what is required for the data that we are actually modelling. This approach (use of `float64`) seems more coherent...
On the first case -- the diff is correct, in YANG a `list` has a key that is also present in the list element itself, so it's like writing something...
To be clear, this proposal is **for OpenConfig models specifically**? i.e., we will add a new flag that says "this is a model that still complies with OpenConfig rules, but...
I think it is dangerous to try and do this for models that are not compliant with a particular style, there are many things that can change about those models...