Rob Ede
Rob Ede
i think the issue is related to #3715 where we've discussed and are testing a fix at the actix-http level, i think that supersedes this PR
#304 was implemented and released. If there's more to do for this issue please say so and we'll get it re-opened.
Agreed, I'm apprehensive to swap it out completely, but a cfg-based approach to the fork would be acceptable.
Came here to ask this, too, after reviewing my open pull requests. We use this crate in `actix-multipart`. Happy to take on some responsibility for maintenance @hyunsik
Hey @hyunsik yes I'm also happy to take up maintenance of this crate.
For my own projects, I like to enforce a changelog, whether contributed or self-written after the fact. Either way, I think it's important to keep track of alterations to public...
Could you contrive a test that would fail on master ?
To make progress, this PR needs a test and a changelog entry.
Since my original commit is contained in this PR, I don't mind which is merged. However, I still would like to see this functionality considered.
I'm fine seeing this feature under `hazmat` too, given your hesitancy for incremental verification. My use case is demonstrated in this PR . In web framework land we're not in...