Takatoshi Kondo
> any idea why the tests failed? > > > error: no template named 'unary_function' in namespace 'std'; did you mean '__unary_function'? I updated boost and osx compiler. I just...
Here is a small example to check adaptor support. It checks intrusive pack adaptor only. Maybe there is some way to check non-intrusive adaptor. But I'm not sure. I use...
Unfortunately, I don't have good idea. The current msgpack-c SFINAE is already been complecated due to support multiple versions of API (v1...v3). I don't want to modify the current SFINAE...
Ok, I unsderstand you already been tried it and https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/issues/1051#issue-1571826983 describes it. I guess that the key feature is expression SFINAE that has been introduced since C++11. Maybe the following...
> out of curiosity: i wonder what's the reason of using c++03 as minimum requirement in 2023? (e.g. c++11 is around for 10+ years already) When I inherit msgpack-c project,...
It seems that there is no practical way to support both cmake < 3.5 and 4.0 It is a time to drop cmake < 3.5 support. Most of platform has...
@theoparis I created PRs #1159, #1160 could you check them ?
This test code could help you: https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-c/blob/820ccf1f1d919b98a0bbe1ed9e9a004e922a80fc/test/msgpack_cpp11.cpp#L873-L887
Thank you for reporting the issue. # For C++ When I implemented some C++ feature related to EXT32, I did #175 design choice. So C++ version should work well on...
@tarruda any ideas?