pgaudet
pgaudet
Thanks @RLovering ! @hattrill There is a single FlyBase annotation, to the Rho GTPase-activating protein Graf; do you think it's OK calling this a ubiquititin reader?
Yes, so far readers are adaptors. Is this consistent with this annotation?
Hi Val, Where is this mapping coming from?
The GO term for the dual specificity kinase is protein serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase activity You're right that in GO we would not annotate to "GO:0004713 protein tyrosine kinase activity
In fact *we* maintain GO-> RHEA mappings !! (sorry I was also confused for a bit). You can change them in the ontology.
@ValWood I dont see this mapping; I'll close for now, please reopen if you find the source of the incorrect mapping.
I guess the KW is https://www.uniprot.org/keywords/KW-0723? @Antonialock Can you please check?
> I'm not sure why we have a term for "protein serine kinase activity", anything which phosphorylates serine also phosphorylates threonine ? @ValWood you can check the term in Protege,...
WRT problematic RHEA mappings (https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/P10506/entry): RHEA splits each activity WRT substrate, ie a Ser/Thr kinase is annotated to 2 RHEA terms, one for Ser, one for Thr, since they are...
@Antonialock MAPKK should be mapped to dual specificity kinase activity: [protein serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase activity](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0004712), shouldn't it?